As prices are rising, everywhere, for almost everything, the prospect of human suffering that this will cause is deeply disturbing. There is predictions that the number of people in the world suffering from acute hunger – currently 276 million – could soon increase by 47 million.

To solve the problem, one thing that many agree with keeps trade barriers low. This means not banning exports when individual countries hold their supplies, and making sure the sanctions don’t affect vital food supplies. There are fears that any barriers to global food flows will simply push prices higher.

This emphasis on keeping prices low is understandable and necessary. But it is also worrisome, as the economic mechanisms that have driven prices down in recent decades have seriously weakened the global food system.

amazing fish

I learned about this during a recent visit to Kenya. One evening, while eating fish on the shores of Lake Victoria, one of the world’s largest inland fisheries, I asked my Kenyan colleagues where my tilapia came from. The surprising answer was that it was quite possible that it was from China.

But in the cheap food paradigm, it makes sense. China has done a phenomenal job in developing its aquaculture industry (now about 60% world market), as well as invest in African transport infrastructure.

Extremely efficient production and distribution have reduced costs, allowing local vendors in Kenya to make a living selling imported tilapia at prices their customers can afford.

This is exactly the kind of dynamic that the globalization of food has allowed. But when global trade is disrupted, the entire system is at risk.

Until recently, for example, Ukraine delivered 36% sunflower oil in the world. The Russian invasion has sharp decline in trade from Ukraine, making this key ingredient significantly more expensive for the millions of households and companies around the world that use it.

The other side of globalization

Many African countries depend on Ukraine and Russia for more than half their wheat
War-induced supply shortages, along with catastrophically high fertilizer prices, threaten increase hunger in the region.

This is the other side of the global effort to keep food prices low. On the one hand, increased productivity and competitiveness have made it possible to produce food at a lower cost and distribute it to the people who need it. But the relentless pursuit of efficiency and competitive advantage has created risks to the sustainability of the food system.

This means fewer countries and companies now dominate, reducing the diversity of food sources and supply chains needed to be strong and secure. How UN report in food insecurity, diversity matters because it “creates multiple avenues for shock mitigation”. These upheavals can be catastrophic.

Not surprisingly, many countries overestimate their dependence on imported food to feed their people.

Protecting the planet

Focus on keeping food prices low also detracts from other issues such as the environment and supporting sustainable livelihoods.

As UN Secretary General António Guterres indicated:

“Food systems have the potential to realize our shared vision for a better world. [by] feed a growing population in ways that promote nutrition, human health and well-being, restore and protect nature, are climate-neutral, locally adapted, and provide decent jobs and an inclusive economy.”

It is unlikely that the fish I ate in Kisumu was produced in such a way as to address many of these concerns. But the cheapness of food comes at a high cost elsewhere—for people’s health, their livelihoods, and the entire planet.

These “hidden costs” were appreciated nearly $20 trillion (£16.3 trillion) a year. Simply put, the prices we pay for food today do not reflect the true cost of producing it, and such a system is not viable.

There is no doubt that food must cross borders in large enough quantities to prevent famine. But there is also no doubt that future generations will need to be able to rely on a more sustainable global food system that includes prices, diet, environment, livelihoods and sustainability.

Any fight against hunger must consider not only how to keep food cheap in the short term, but also how to rebuild food systems in the long term to be stronger and more resilient. This will entail significant changes, but there are already signs of shifts in the work of the world economy.

One famous investor recently commented that the Russian invasion Ukraine “ended globalization as we know it,” predicting a process of “deglobalization” and companies reconfiguring their global supply chains.

Accounting for real costs

This makes it possible to use latest research find out what economic models are needed to transform the planet’s food systems. This should include accounting for “true cost”which correctly reflects the various costs and benefits of producing, transporting and selling what we eat.

In addition, significant steps need to be taken to create a food system that includes circular economy (with more emphasis on sharing, reuse and recycling) and the “bioeconomy” model, with its emphasis on conservation of biological resources.

Politicians, businesses and consumers must recognize that low food prices are part of a bigger problem. Focusing solely on keeping food as cheap as possible and relentlessly pursuing productivity and profits is not the way to keep the world fed.

Things must change. And the fact that now is the most difficult time to solve this problem, which is why we must do it.

Corinna Hawkes is director of the City Food Policy Center at the University of London, where she is a professor. She is a Distinguished Fellow at the George Institute for Global Health, Co-Chair of the Think20 Working Group on Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture, and Chair of the Bite Back 2030 Board.

This comment was originally posted by The Conversation—Rising prices: why the global drive to make food cheaper is not viable

More about inflation

Zoe Khan: Inflation forces Americans to change their diet: “We cook vegetable soup”

AP: Huge crowds took to the streets of London to protest rising cost of living

Kathleen Merrigan: Fertilizer prices are skyrocketing and this is an opportunity to promote more sustainable ways to grow crops.

By them

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.